Unlikely 2.0


   The universe is wider than our views of it. —Henry David Thoreau


Join our mailing list!


Google Custom Search


Recent Articles:

A Discussion with Tim Barrus and Mary Scriver by Eavan O'Callaghan
Tilting at Windmills: A Short Film by Tim Barrus and the Students of Cinematheque Films
Tom Bradley's video reading from his novel, Lemur
An Excerpt from Simon Friel's novel, Murmur
Molasses: Fiction by Heather Palmer
Oil Babies: Fiction by Sophie Chamas
A Blast Chorus: Fiction by Nathan Lee Smith
Denouement on K Street: Fiction by Maureen Griswold
A Selection of H'our Dourves by Ryan B. Richey
Hogeye Bill on patriotism as the antithesis of peace
Mickey Z. on the origin of belief
A Defence of Religion by Iftekhar Sayeed
Timber Masterson's improbable memories of Leave It to Beaver
Nine Digital Paintings by Peter Schwartz
Nine Altered Photographs by Amy Kohut
Saladin in the Dragon: Poetry by Ryan Undeen
Two Poems by Ānanda Selah Ösel
Two Poems by Martha L. Deed
Two Poems by Robert Louis Henry
Three Poems by Cynthia Ruth Lewis
Three Poems by Sean Patrick Hill
Three Poems by Luis Cuauhtemoc Berriozabal
Three Poems by Chris D'Errico
Three Poems by Louise Landes Levi
Spoken Word by Barry Wallenstein with a Tribute by Eric Smiarowski
Chapters Seven through Nine of sLAsH by Bill Berry


Bookmarks:

Goodreads

del.icio.us



The First Combination Special Video Contest

Print this article


They're All Insane and Do Nothing for Your Films
A Conversation on Low-Budget Film with Matt Hoos, Mark A. Lewis, and Gabriel Ricard

Gabriel Ricard: And I'm probably fucking this conference up with boring nonsense, so I'll shut up.
Jonathan Penton: I don't think we've started yet.
GR: Oh.
Matt Hoos: Here I thought I was doing well so far.
JP: Mark, you were brought in late, and I don't think Gabriel and Matt know much about what you do. Why don't you tell us what you've been working on?
Mark A. Lewis: Writing. Just writing for time being. My first feature has been through festival circuit. Did fairly well. Now I'm trying to keep the dream alive.
JP: Where did you go?
MH: What was your feature, Mark?
ML: Ill Fated. It went all over. Toronto, Slamdance, Shanghai, Mannheim, Mumbai (or the print did anyway).
MH: Which of them were you able to attend in person?
ML: Uh, Toronto, Slamdance, Mannheim - my producer went to Shanghai.
MH: Very cool. Was it produced in association with any of the usual national funding programs?
ML: Initially private money, but then provincial at 11th hour and finally federal after we had completed the film. To be honest it feels like a success story without the success.
GR: Heh. Well, at least you got some money.
JP: Tell us about the usual national funding programs.
MH: Basically in Canada (unlike the US) there is some (small) amount of government and provincial funding to support independent cinema. There's also several institutions which sponsor ultra-low and low-budget films (like the Canadian Film Centre, which funded Khaled, Cube, etc.)
ML: Very competitive. Very bureaucratic.
MH: The concept of public funding for cinema is pretty bizarre to the US, so I'm used to explaining it.
ML: It's still bizarre to me. But it can be a blessing and/or a curse.
MH: Brad Fox, my producer, deals with all of them as a day job working on large co-productions (20M plus) so he could tell you more if you want to know about it.
GR: Public funding for arts period... is pretty damn bizarre to the US.
MH: True, but private equity investment in Canada is nearly unheard of (outside of self-investment) as there's no domestic market. Where was your private money from, Mark? Generalize if you want.
ML: My producer had friends (young guys) investment bankers with extra cash. Not a lot of money at the end of the day but it got the ball rolling.
JP: it's funny that you mention Cube... as Gabriel's script largely revolves around a fictional "room" that does not exist in normal human experience, which brings up questions on the idea of making a story visual with little to no special effects.
GR: Well, I'm pretty much set up to write like that.
MH: The creative team I work with has always set out to create projects which can be done for no- to low-budget means as opposed to shoe-horning "dream projects" into that way of working.
GR: Well, that's how you have to operate on this level...
ML: Yeah, we had to have the mentality that we are doing what we're doing with or without money. We were casting the film with no money in place...
MH: I'm still amazed at how many people try to go head to head with Hollywood budgeted genres (action, sci-fi) without taking into account their budget realities. The results will all look "direct to video" at best when you do that.
GR: Not always.
MH: Well no... but many of times the films people trot out to make that argument, such as El Mariachi or Cube have much bigger issues going on under the surface that don't make that a fair comparison. Clever will always win out over "wads of cash and phoning it in."
ML: Of course.
GR: In a fair world, yeah.
ML: It's certainly an intricate business. Difficult to make a living in if you have any artistic inclinations... but somehow worth starving for.
MH: We just put together a big funding application for the aforementioned Canadian Film Centre. It was mind-boggling to me that anyone (other than us) would go to the hassle with such a competitive marketplace and little chance for reward - but when you're driven, you're driven, I guess.
GR: Yeah, it's like being the worst kind of junkie. Still, that's about the only thing making me want to go back to Canada... is the chance to be able to apply for film grants.
ML: The Film Centre doesn't offer very much.
MH: I laugh because Brad goes to talk to film schools, and it turns into half hour sessions of him begging them to get out of the industry. They never listen to him, even though he's right.

Continued...